Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Clin Case Rep ; 11(4): e7245, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2305564

ABSTRACT

Pancreaticopleural fistula should be considered in alcohol abusers with pleural effusion, which can exhibit a black color.

2.
IJID Reg ; 7: 6-10, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2273587

ABSTRACT

Objective: To analyse the effect of hospital pre-admission screening and enhanced precaution strategies on the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted over 17 months from 11 May 2020 to 30 September 2021 at a large hospital in Tokyo. Universal DNA amplification tests were conducted during pre-admission screening, and enhanced precaution strategies were implemented for all patients with negative admission tests. The primary outcome was the occurrence of symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients after admission. The secondary outcomes were time-series analyses of monthly positive admission test numbers, positive rates, clinical features in positive cases, and clinically confirmed nosocomial transmission. Results: In total, 32,081 patients were screened pre-admission (29,556 asymptomatic patients and 2525 symptomatic patients). Of the asymptomatic patients, 0.11% (n=32) tested positive and were admitted to a designated COVID-19 ward or were not admitted. Among the five inpatients who developed symptomatic COVID-19 during hospitalization, only two cases were related to a single nosocomial transmission. Conclusion: Pre-admission test screening was effective in identifying asymptomatic cases of COVID-19. This allowed administrators to quarantine patients or delay hospital admission. The combination of testing and enhanced precaution strategies for asymptomatic cases of COVID-19 may minimize nosocomial transmission.

3.
J Infect Chemother ; 2022 Nov 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2236884

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although dexamethasone is an effective treatment in cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring oxygen, the efficacy of methylprednisolone pulse is unclear. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of methylprednisolone pulse to those of dexamethasone. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on adult COVID-19 cases requiring oxygen and no invasive mechanical ventilation treated with methylprednisolone pulse (1 g/day for 3 days) or dexamethasone (6 mg/day orally or 6.6 mg/day intravenously for ≥5 days). The primary outcome was intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The secondary outcomes were hospital mortality, length of hospital stay (LoS), duration of oxygen requirement, and requirement for hospital transfer, vasopressor(s), intubation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). RESULTS: Twenty two cases of methylprednisolone pulse and 77 cases of dexamethasone were included. Mask ventilation was more common in the methylprednisolone pulse group (P < 0.001). The proportion of ICU admissions was similar between both groups (P = 0.635). The secondary outcomes of hospital mortality and the requirement for hospital transfer, vasopressor(s), intubation, and CRRT were similar between groups. No cases received ECMO. Median LoS (P = 0.006) and duration of oxygen requirement (P = 0.004) were longer in the methylprednisolone pulse group. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of ICU admissions was similar between the methylprednisolone pulse and the dexamethasone group. However, more cases in the methylprednisolone pulse group required mask ventilation than in the dexamethasone group, suggesting that some cases benefited from methylprednisolone pulse.

4.
Intern Med ; 61(9): 1371-1374, 2022 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1951858

ABSTRACT

We herein report a case of acute myocarditis possibly related to the second dose of an mRNA-coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine in a 45-year-old woman with no remarkable medical history. She had a fever for one week following the second dose of the mRNA-1273 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine. One week later, she presented with chest pain and electrocardiogram changes. Her serum troponin levels were elevated upon admission. Echocardiography showed segmental wall motion abnormalities of the apex, apical portion of the anterior and inferior walls. The findings of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging were consistent with acute myocarditis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Myocarditis , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Myocarditis/diagnostic imaging , Myocarditis/etiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
5.
Cardiovasc Interv Ther ; 37(4): 641-650, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1616275

ABSTRACT

The situation around primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has dramatically changed since coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on clinical outcomes as well as door-to-balloon time (DTBT), which is known as one of the indicators of early reperfusion, has not been fully investigated in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). The purpose of this study was to compare DTBT and in-hospital outcomes in patients with STEMI between before versus after COVID-19 pandemic. The primary interest was DTBT and the incidence of in-hospital outcomes including in-hospital death. We included 330 patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI, and divided them into the pre COVID-19 group (n = 209) and the post COVID-19 group (n = 121). DTBT was significantly longer in the post COVID-19 group than in the pre COVID-19 group (p < 0.001), whereas the incidence of in-hospital death was comparable between the 2 groups (p = 0.238). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, chest CT before primary PCI (OR 4.64, 95% CI 2.58-8.34, p < 0.001) was significantly associated with long DTBT, whereas chest CT before primary PCI (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.29-1.97, p = 0.570) was not associated with in-hospital death after controlling confounding factors. In conclusion, although DTBT was significantly longer after COVID-19 pandemic than before COVID-19 pandemic, in-hospital outcomes were comparable between before versus after COVID-19 pandemic. This study suggests the validity of the screening tests including chest CT for COVID-19 in patients with STEMI who undergo primary PCI.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals , Humans , Pandemics , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Time-to-Treatment , Treatment Outcome
6.
Surg Endosc ; 36(7): 5483-5490, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1611410

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Telesimulation helps overcome limitations in time and local expertise by eliminating the need for the learner and educator to be physically co-located, especially important during COVID-19. We investigated whether teaching advanced laparoscopic suturing (ALS) through telesimulation is feasible, effective, and leads to improved suturing in the operating room (OR). METHODS: In this prospective feasibility study, three previously developed 3D-printed ALS tasks were used: needle handling (NH), suturing under tension (UT), and continuous suturing (CS). General surgery residents (PGY4-5) underwent 1-month of telesimulation training, during which an expert educator at one site remotely trained residents at the other site over 2-3 teaching sessions. Trainees were assessed in the three tasks and in the OR at three time points: baseline(A1), control period(A2), and post-intervention(A3) and completed questionnaires regarding educational value and usability of telesimulation. Paired t-test was used to compare scores between the three assessment points. RESULTS: Six residents were included. Scores for UT improved significantly post-intervention A3(568 ± 60) when compared to baseline A1(416 ± 133) (p < 0.019). Similarly, scores for CS improved significantly post-intervention A3(756 ± 113) vs. baseline A1(539 ± 211) (p < 0.02). For intraoperative assessments, scores improved significantly post-intervention A3(21 ± 3) when compared to both A1(17 ± 4) (p < 0.018) and A2(18 ± 4) (p < 0.0008). All residents agreed that tasks were relevant to practice, helped improve technical competence, and adequately measured suturing skill. All residents found telesimulation easy to use, had strong educational value, and want the system to be incorporated into their training. CONCLUSION: The use of telesimulation for remotely training residents using ALS tasks was feasible and effective. Residents found value in training using the tasks and telesimulation system, and improved ALS skills in the OR. As the pandemic has caused a major structural shift in resident education, telesimulation can be an effective alternative to on-site simulation programs. Future research should focus on how telesimulation can be effectively incorporated into training programs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Laparoscopy , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Laparoscopy/education , Prospective Studies , Suture Techniques/education
7.
Heliyon ; 7(8): e07743, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1531289

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of three reporting systems for computed tomography findings in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), namely the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS), COVID-19 Imaging Reporting and Data System (COVID-RADS), and Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) expert consensus statement, in a low COVID-19 prevalence area. METHOD: This institutional review board approval single-institutional retrospective study included 154 hospitalized patients between April 1 and May 21, 2020; 26 (16.9 %; 63.2 ± 14.1 years, 21 men) and 128 (65.7 ± 16.4 years, 87 men) patients were diagnosed with and without COVID-19 according to reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction results, respectively. Written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. Six radiologists independently classified chest computed tomography images according to each reporting system. The area under receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and interobserver agreements were calculated and compared across the systems using paired t-test and kappa analysis. RESULTS: Mean area under receiver operating characteristic curves were as follows: CO-RADS, 0.89 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.90); COVID-RADS, 0.78 (0.75-0.80); and RSNA expert consensus statement, 0.88 (0.86-0.90). Average kappa values across observers were 0.52 (95 % CI: 0.45-0.60), 0.51 (0.41-0.61), and 0.57 (0.49-0.64) for CO-RADS, COVID-RADS, and RSNA expert consensus statement, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were the highest at 0.71, 0.53, 0.72, 0.96, and 0.56 in the CO-RADS; 0.56, 0.31, 0.54, 0.95, and 0.35 in the COVID-RADS; 0.83, 0.49, 0.61, 0.96, and 0.55 in the RSNA expert consensus statement, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CO-RADS exhibited the highest specificity, positive predictive value, which are especially important in a low-prevalence population, while maintaining high accuracy and negative predictive value, demonstrating the best performance in a low-prevalence population.

8.
Insights Imaging ; 12(1): 155, 2021 Nov 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1496216

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed a major public health crisis all over the world. The role of chest imaging, especially computed tomography (CT), has evolved during the pandemic paralleling the accumulation of scientific evidence. In the early stage of the pandemic, the performance of chest imaging for COVID-19 has widely been debated especially in the context of comparison to real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Current evidence is against the use of chest imaging for routine screening of COVID-19 contrary to the initial expectations. It still has an integral role to play, however, in its work up and staging, especially when assessing complications or disease progression. Chest CT is gold standard imaging modality for COVID-19 pneumonia; in some situations, chest X-ray or ultrasound may be an effective alternative. The most important role of radiologists in this context is to be able to identify those patients at greatest risk of imminent clinical decompensation by learning to stratify cases of COVID-19 on the basis of radiologic imaging in the most efficient and timely fashion possible. The present availability of multiple and more refined CT grading systems and classification is now making this task easier and thereby contributing to the recent improvements achieved in COVID-19 treatment and outcomes. In this article, evidence of chest imaging regarding diagnosis, management and monitoring of COVID-19 will be chronologically reviewed.

9.
HLA ; 98(1): 37-42, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1199730

ABSTRACT

HLA-A, -C, -B, and -DRB1 genotypes were analyzed in 178 Japanese COVID-19 patients to investigate the association of HLA with severe COVID-19. Analysis of 32 common HLA alleles at four loci revealed a significant association between HLA-DRB1*09:01 and severe COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR], 3.62; 95% CI, 1.57-8.35; p = 0.00251 [permutation p value = 0.0418]) when age, sex, and other common HLA alleles at the DRB1 locus were adjusted. The DRB1*09:01 allele was more significantly associated with risk for severe COVID-19 compared to preexisting medical conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. These results indicate a potential role for HLA in predisposition to severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , HLA-DRB1 Chains , Alleles , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/genetics , Gene Frequency , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , HLA-DRB1 Chains/genetics , Humans
11.
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging ; 2(6): e200492, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1156015

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the performance and interobserver agreement of the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS), the COVID-19 imaging reporting and data system (COVID-RADS), the RSNA expert consensus statement, and the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) guidance statement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this case-control study, total of 100 symptomatic patients suspected of having COVID-19 were included: 50 patients with COVID-19 (59±17 years, 38 men) and 50 patients without COVID-19 (65±24 years, 30 men). Eight radiologists independently scored chest CT images of the cohort according to each reporting system. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and interobserver agreements were calculated and statistically compared across the systems. RESULTS: A total of 800 observations were made for each system. The level of suspicion of COVID-19 correlated with the RT-PCR positive rate except for the "negative for pneumonia" classifications in all the systems (Spearman's coefficient: ρ=1.0, P=<.001 for all the systems). Average AUCs were as follows: CO-RADS, 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.85): COVID-RADS, 0.80 (0.78-0.81): the RSNA statement, 0.81 (0.79-0.82): and the BSTI statement, 0.84 (0.812-0.86). Average Cohen's kappa across observers was 0.62 (95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.66), 0.63 (0.58-0.68), 0.63 (0.57-0.69), and 0.61 (0.58-0.64) for CO-RADS, COVID-RADS, the RSNA statement and the BSTI statement, respectively. CO-RADS and the BSTI statement outperformed COVID-RADS and the RSNA statement in diagnostic performance (P=.<.05 for all the comparison). CONCLUSIONS: CO-RADS, COVID-RADS, the RSNA statement and the BSTI statement provided reasonable performances and interobserver agreements in reporting CT findings of COVID-19.

12.
Acute Med Surg ; 7(1): e569, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-812786

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of steroid treatment for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is unknown. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old man was transported to our hospital due to impaired consciousness and respiratory failure. After admission, tracheal aspirate of the patient was harvested, and it tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 nucleic acid. He required veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to sustain his oxygenation. However, his respiratory failure did not improve for 20 days. On day 20 of admission, we started to use i.v. steroid therapy. On day 23, lung opacity on the chest X-ray cleared and the patient's oxygen saturation improved significantly. We successfully removed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on day 27. CONCLUSION: Our case report encourages more future trials to evaluate the therapeutic use of i.v. steroid in severe COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome.

13.
Journal of Japanese Association for Operating Technology ; 41(2):167-174, 2020.
Article in Japanese | JAMA Network | ID: covidwho-799339

ABSTRACT

With the spread of novel coronavirus infections, there is a growing concern about the risk of infection due to "surgical smoke" generated by the use of energy devices. Surgical smoke contains various particles, including carcinogens, bacteria, and viruses, and can spread up to one meter from the site of occurrence. In addition, since surgical smoke can cause exposure to the peripheral parts of the lungs, it is necessary to deal with the health hazards of patients and healthcare workers and the risk of infection. To reduce the risk of exposure to surgical smoke, the use of smoke evacuation devices that effectively inhale and filter surgical smoke, in addition to standard personal protective equipment, is recommended mainly in Europe and the United States. Although the risk of infection from surgical smoke generated during surgery for patients infected with novel coronaviruses is not clear, wisdom and efforts are required to take all measures to reduce the risk of infection, including smoke evacuation devices, in order to ensure the safety of patients and medical personnel. (Author's abstract)

14.
Inflamm Regen ; 40: 14, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-609264

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the ensuing worldwide pandemic. The spread of the virus has had global effects such as activity restriction, economic stagnation, and collapse of healthcare infrastructure. Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection induces a cytokine storm, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiple organ failure, which are very serious health conditions and must be mitigated or resolved as soon as possible. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their exosomes can affect immune cells by inducing anti-inflammatory macrophages, regulatory T and B cells, and regulatory dendritic cells, and can inactivate T cells. Hence, they are potential candidate agents for treatment of severe cases of COVID-19. In this review, we report the background of severe cases of COVID-19, basic aspects and mechanisms of action of MSCs and their exosomes, and discuss basic and clinical studies based on MSCs and exosomes for influenza-induced ARDS. Finally, we report the potential of MSC and exosome therapy in severe cases of COVID-19 in recently initiated or planned clinical trials of MSCs (33 trials) and exosomes (1 trial) registered in 13 countries on ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL